Moving Up From Your Kit Lens

I was visiting some friends yesterday for the Easter holiday and of course I had my camera with me to take some shots of the egg hunting. I didn’t bring a lit of gear with me, just my D7000 and the 50mm f/1.4 G series lens. One of my friends at the gathering brought her camera as well and was lamenting the fact that she couldn’t get shots with the blurry backgrounds like I was getting. That’s when I explained that the kit lens is okay for your everyday kind of shots but that it also has a lot of limitations.

It’s hard for new photographers to sometimes grasp that they need to invest in a better lens if they want to take things up a notch, photographically speaking. It can also be a hard pill to swallow that getting the right lens can sometimes require an investment that is more than they spent on the camera itself.

We spent some time taking pictures of her beautiful children and I explained the relationship between lens aperture and depth of field. The big problem with most kit lenses are that they have fairly small apertures when they are extended to their maximum focal lengths. Most dslr camera kit lenses are 18-55mm with a variable aperture that goes from f/3.5 at 18mm to f/5.6 at 55mm. I also explained the effects of focal length and depth of field and suggested that she would get better results shooting wide open at 55mm and move in close to her subjects. This will do a fairly decent job but if she really wanted more bokeh (the word that describes the out of focus area that comes from a narrow depth of field) that she should consider one of two possibilities. The first is that she get a lens like I was using, the 50mm f/1.4.

It’s not an overly expensive prime lens at around $550 at B&H Photo. It does however have some limitations that someone shooting zooms may not like, like having to zoom with your feet. I learned photography with a 50mm so it’s not a big deal for me but it does take a little getting used to. My other suggestion was to get the 18-200 DX VRII lens. We had another friend there who happened to have this lens so I borrowed it to show how you can get some great bokeh by shooting in the 200mm range of the lens with the aperture wide open to f/5.6. Same aperture as her 18-55mm, but the results were substantially better. Plus it’s just a much more versatile lens that covers a great range of focal lengths, from wide to telephoto. Unfortunately it’s also a much more expensive piece of glass that will run around $850.

The takeaway from all of this is that the kit lens is pretty pedestrian and, in my opinion, only serves the purpose of getting you used to the camera and controls as you prepare to move forward in your photography. When that time comes, you will need to bite the bullet and start investing in some better optics to really notice an improvement in your photography. And I think investment really is the right word. I know a lot of photographers whose lenses have served them well past their first, second, and even third camera bodies.

  • Pingback: CS Bloggers

  • robert

    A nice alternative to the 50mm (when shooting Nikon) when using a crop sensor is the 35/1.8 AF-S G which more closely mimics the 50mm many of us learned on, and it only costs about $200. Sharp and light, it’s a cheap addition to the kit and a nice everyday lens, even if you do have to zoom with your feet ;-)

  • Pingback: Alltop Photography

  • Pingback: Martin Jerresand

  • http://www.kimberlygauthier.com/blog Through the Lens of Kimberly Gauthier, Photography Blog

    I’ve had two camera bodies and several lenses, but have found that the advice I got eons ago to buy the best glass that I can afford has served me well. It’s not necessary to buy lenses new, which is what a lot of new photographers don’t get. I bought all of mine on Amazon, eBay, and at the local camera store, because they sell slightly used lenses.

    And if you’re not sure, borrow one for a weekend, test drive it, then buy later :)

  • Pingback: Phyllis Grannis

  • http://www.canonblogger.com/feed/atom/ Jason

    While the principle is definitely well-grounded, I do think that many people do not give the kit lenses a fair shake. Your own example here is showing the subject shot at a much greater distance than the first, and whenever you increase the distance to subject, the less “desirable” the bokeh – in a manner of speaking. I can take the kit lens and at f5.6 produce some really good portraits when up close and personal.

    As some are known for saying, “The best camera (or lens in this case) is the one you have with you”, and it’s simply a matter of knowing how to get the best shots out of it. That comes with a solid grasp of the principles, and then a creative eye. Good article nonetheless, but I have to say I kinda like my kit lens! :-)

  • Pingback: Mike Moschitta

  • http://www.harryhilders-fotografie.com Harry Hilders

    Great pictures!, Nice post.

  • http://www.computernetworkingsolutions.co.uk cns2012

    If you want to immortalise those special moments at a higher quality, this is what you have to do.