Subscribe in a reader

Image courtesy of Nikon

Image courtesy of Nikon

Nikon has just released its first prime lens for the DX form factor cameras (D300, D90, D60).  The new AF-S DX Nikkor 35mm f/1.8 will soon be available for the fairly modest price of $200 US.  For those of you that may not be in the know about what a prime lens is, it’s simply a lens that has a fixed focal length, in this case it’s 35mm.  Frankly I was surprised to see Nikon roll out a new prime for the DX cameras, especially since there are now 3 FX full frame models available.  Nikon’s take is that they wanted to bring the benefits of a prime lens to their consumer level cameras at an affordable price.  Previously, if a DX shooter wanted to use a prime lens, they had to buy the more expensive full frame lenses.  This lens has been engineered for the DX format with a focal length that is equivalent in coverage to the 50mm for the FX or 35mm cameras.

So why buy a prime lens when there are so many zooms available?  There’s actually a couple of reasons.  The first is that at f/1.8, the lens is faster and will provide better low-light shooting.  The second is that prime lenses tend to be sharper than their zooming counterparts.  This is due to the fact that prime lenses have fewer lens elements.  The less glass the light passes through, the less chance there is for softening of the image.  Another benefit is that this lens in particular uses 7 blades for the paerture to provide a better, smoother bokeh (the “out of focus” portion of your image).  I guess that makes 3 reasons for purchasing one.

There are some downsides to using a prime lens.  The first thing that comes to mind is the fixed focal length.  No zoom means that you will have to move your feet to compose your shot.  Secondly, you will be restricted in the type of photo that you can get with the lens.  A 35mm DX is a little wide for standard portrait work and not quite wide enough for landscapes.  You will definitely need to find your nitch for this particular focal length.

There are photographers though that swear by their prime lenses and the best way to really appreciate using one is to shoot with one.  Not to date myself, but the 50mm prime used to be the “kit” lens for most 35mm camera bodies when I began shooting and was the first lens I ever used (50mm f/1.4 on a Canon F1 body).  It will definitely force you to be more creative in your composition and the faster glass and narrow depth of field will give DX shooters more options for their photographic pursuits.  Nikon has even hinted that they will be producing even more prime lenses in the future for both of their form factors.  Maybe some day they will offer as many options as Canon shooters have become accustomed to.

You can check out Nikon’s press release for this lens over at Imaging Insider.

Related posts:

  1. Macro on the Cheap
  2. Nikon Announces 4 New Products
  3. New Nikon for dSLR Video Shooters – The D5000
  4. Alien Skin Bokeh – A Kick-Butt Photoshop Plug-In
  5. Nikon D3X Rumors Starting to Circulate
14 Responses to “Nikon DX Goes Prime-Time”
Trackbacks
  1.  
Comments
  1. Roger Dallman says:

    Don’t you just love telling the youngsters about the old days. I loved my Canon F1! It was a tank that worked forever. If the battery died, you could still shoot at 1/60 – try that with today’s camera’s. I dropped it on it’s pentaprism during a fall, walking up to Neu Schwanstein in the winter. Bent the pentaprism, but it still worked like a champ. Oh, sorry, we’re talking about prime lens. I’m back now. ;-)
    I see the fixed focal length as an advantage. Moving around the picture will force you to explore different views to get the right shot. Too many photographers today don’t take the time to find the right position for the best image – they just rack the zoom until it’s in focus. Two different actions entirely.
    Roger

  2. Andy says:

    I agree with Roger’s second paragraph. The lack of a “zoom” isn’t so much a negative as simply a different approach. As you nicely note, it forces creativity.

    When studying music composition, I had a teacher who noted that some restrictions can actually help guide you and provide a focus (no pun intended) to a work. I’d think that would apply just as well to photography.

  3. mike meyer says:

    This is an interesting development by Nikon since I was convinced that eventually the DX format would go away. So 35mm on a DX would be equivalent to a 52.5 on a full frame. That would be great for students learning basic photo. The other bad thing about zooming, and I’m very guilty of this, is getting close to you subjects like people. If you want to learn to shoot people you can’t be afraid to get up close. This lens will definitely help with that. Very affordable to boot.

    mike meyer

  4. Don says:

    Mike, your math is wrong. The new lens is designed to cover the area of the smaller sensor, not the full frame area of the “FX” sensor or 35mm film frame. When placing this lens on a full frame camera the exposed area would not be able to reach the edges. I hope your head is feeling better – Now get back to work.

    Don

  5. William Beem says:

    I’m afraid this isn’t the first DX prime. I already have a 10.5mm Fisheye for DX format.

  6. jeff says:

    You are absolutely right William. I forgot about the 10.5mm. I don’t think that fish-eye lenses are what pops into someones mind when talking about a prime lens but it is a fixed focal length…and a very cool lens to boot!

  7. mike meyer says:

    Hey Don, what magnification factor are you using? I have always heard that a DX lens is multiplied by 1.5 to be equal to a full frame lens. 35 x 1.5 = 52.2. I couldn’t find anything exactly about this on the Nikon site.

    mike meyer

    ps: I am always working

  8. Brian says:

    What surprises me is how everyone seems so shocked that Nikon produced this lens. I can’t tell you the number of inquires about the AF 50mm f/1.8D lens. Not to mention the moans and groans about the “Crop Factor” and how you have to manually focus on a D40/x & D60. Now that Nikon has produced just one lens for DX, and I’m sure that there is more on the way, people are moaning over that. Can’t please them all!

    I think this is a really decent move for Nikon and a reaffirmation that the DX-format isn’t going anywhere, at least for a few years. With the current price increases on the old AF 50mm f/1.8D, a $199 price tag sounds quite appealing. Though the first lens that I will put on my future FX body will be my Nikon 50mm prime. :) I just love the way 50mm looks so “natural” on a FX sensor.

  9. Pat says:

    I’m new to photography so this is probably a stupid question for the knowledgeable people that frequent this site. However, a Canon user recently told me he had a fixed focal length lens and to focus it, he had to move back and forth as he composed and then shoot at the moment it was in focus. I would have thought that fixed focal length just referred to the image “magnification” (50 mm as opposed to 200 mm) not the focusing. Is there either auto focus or a focusing ring on this new lens? Thanks in advance to my photography mentors!

    • jeff says:

      Pat,
      I’m not sure what lens your friend had but fixed focal length refers to the length of the lens, usually stated in millimeters. You do have to move back and forth to compose the image and get your subject framed as you want but focusing should either be handled via the auto-focus mechanism or by turning the focus ring.

  10. Don says:

    Mike – you have it backwards. When you put a non DX lens on a digital camera with a smaller sensor the mag value is 1.5x not the other way around. And you can’t be working if you post on this blog before 7am. ;-) See ya next week.

    Brian – I love the “crop factor” with the DX-format save me from using my teleconvertors!

    Don

  11. Pat says:

    Thanks, Jeff for confirming what I thought. I have not Idea what my friend was trying to do. At least I know I’m not totally confused.

  12.  
Leave a Reply