<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chasing the Megapixel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.revellphotography.com/blog/2007/11/chasing-the-megapixel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.revellphotography.com/blog/2007/11/chasing-the-megapixel/</link>
	<description>Walking our way through the photographic world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 04:09:38 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Photography The Way I See It &#187; The megapixel myth</title>
		<link>http://www.revellphotography.com/blog/2007/11/chasing-the-megapixel/comment-page-1/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>Photography The Way I See It &#187; The megapixel myth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 17:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revellphotography.com/blog/?p=247#comment-223</guid>
		<description>[...] at Jeff&#8217;s Photo Gallery, Jeff Revell has his own take on this in a recent post. I&#8217;ve posted on this before and so I&#8217;ll not repeat myself here, but check out [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at Jeff&#8217;s Photo Gallery, Jeff Revell has his own take on this in a recent post. I&#8217;ve posted on this before and so I&#8217;ll not repeat myself here, but check out [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walter</title>
		<link>http://www.revellphotography.com/blog/2007/11/chasing-the-megapixel/comment-page-1/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 10:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revellphotography.com/blog/?p=247#comment-222</guid>
		<description>How true...
I&#039;m still satisfied with my old D2H at only 4 megapixel! Ok, I can&#039;t wait for the D3 to arrive but that&#039;s because of high ISO...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How true&#8230;<br />
I&#8217;m still satisfied with my old D2H at only 4 megapixel! Ok, I can&#8217;t wait for the D3 to arrive but that&#8217;s because of high ISO&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike meyer</title>
		<link>http://www.revellphotography.com/blog/2007/11/chasing-the-megapixel/comment-page-1/#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator>mike meyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revellphotography.com/blog/?p=247#comment-217</guid>
		<description>Well Jeff, I think we have talked about this before but I swear my 995 Coolpix was sharper that my D1x. Same with my 8700 which had more pixels than the D1x. If your glass is soft you could have a forty million megapixel camera (like KB says) and it won&#039;t do any good. And as far as printing at 150 versus 360 It&#039;s really more about YOUR individual printer. My big LJ printer outputs at 200dpi and everything is sharp even when the file sizes aren&#039;t that big.  So I am always skeptical when someone says that you should always print at 144, 150, 300, 360 or whatever.  Unless you know where the secret pro button is, it doesn&#039;t matter.  Joking aside, if it works for you and you and your clients are happy, forget what anyone else tells you.

mike meyer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Jeff, I think we have talked about this before but I swear my 995 Coolpix was sharper that my D1x. Same with my 8700 which had more pixels than the D1x. If your glass is soft you could have a forty million megapixel camera (like KB says) and it won&#8217;t do any good. And as far as printing at 150 versus 360 It&#8217;s really more about YOUR individual printer. My big LJ printer outputs at 200dpi and everything is sharp even when the file sizes aren&#8217;t that big.  So I am always skeptical when someone says that you should always print at 144, 150, 300, 360 or whatever.  Unless you know where the secret pro button is, it doesn&#8217;t matter.  Joking aside, if it works for you and you and your clients are happy, forget what anyone else tells you.</p>
<p>mike meyer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chasing the Megapixel &#124; Technology</title>
		<link>http://www.revellphotography.com/blog/2007/11/chasing-the-megapixel/comment-page-1/#comment-213</link>
		<dc:creator>Chasing the Megapixel &#124; Technology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 04:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revellphotography.com/blog/?p=247#comment-213</guid>
		<description>[...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
